6

Evaluating $$ F_\nu(t) := \int_0^\infty \frac{u}{2\nu^2} \left( u+ \left( u^2+\nu^2 \right)^\frac{1}{2} \right) \left( e^{-u} - e^{-\left(u^2+\nu^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}} \right) \sin \left( ut \right) \, \mathrm{d} u \, , $$ where $\nu\ge 0$ is a parameter. Considering the simplistic limit when $\nu \to 0$, it can readily be shown that $$ \lim_{\nu\to 0} F_\nu (t) = \frac{1}{2} \int_0^\infty u\, e^{-u} \sin \left(ut\right) \, \mathrm{d} u = \frac{t}{\left( 1+t^2 \right)^2} \, . $$

This integral arises from solving a fluid mechanical problem involving dual integral equations. The full problem has previously been asked in a separate question.

What I tried is to express the sine and exponential functions in terms of series expansions. This yield double sums involving hypergeometric functions. However, an analytical evaluation of the resulting sums does not seen to be within reach.

Assuming that $\alpha \ll 1$ and performing Taylor expansion of $F_\nu(t)$ around $\alpha=0$ leads to a series of terms whose integrals diverge (except the terms $\propto \alpha^2$), making a Taylor-expansion-based approach obsolete.

I am wondering whether there is a clever way to handle this improper integral. Any help is highly appreciated.

keynes
  • 405

1 Answers1

8

One can make some progress in this problem by noticing that, after expanding the products in the integrand, all resulting individual parts of the sum can be expressed in terms of the more general integral

$$I(x,y)=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-xu}e^{-y\sqrt{u^2+v^2}}du$$

In fact, more explicitly one can write

$$\int_0^\infty u\sqrt{u^2+v^2}e^{-u}\sin{ut}~du= \text{Im}\frac{\partial^2I}{\partial x\partial y}\Bigg|_{(x,y)=(1+it,0)}$$ $$\int_0^\infty u^2e^{-\sqrt{u^2+v^2}}\sin{ut}~du= \text{Im}\frac{\partial^2 I}{\partial x^2}\Bigg|_{(x,y)=(it,1)}$$ $$\int_0^\infty u\sqrt{u^2+v^2}e^{-\sqrt{u^2+v^2}}\sin{ut}~du= \text{Im}\frac{\partial^2I}{\partial x\partial y}\Bigg|_{(x,y)=(it,1)}$$

We can hence focus on the evaluation of $I$. First note that $I$ can be expanded in a generating function-like form:

$$I(x,y)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n x^n}{n!}J_n(y)~~,~~ J_n(y):=\int_0^{\infty}u^n e^{-y\sqrt{u^2+v^2}}du$$

It is simple to show that the $J_n$'s obey the following recurrence relation

$$J_{n+2}(y)=\left(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}-v^2\right)J_n(y)$$

and therefore knowledge of $J_0, J_1$ allows determination of all the other moments. We can now write down the formal expression

$$I(x,y)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty x^{2n}\frac{\left(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}-v^2\right)^n}{(2n)!}J_0(y)-\sum_{n=0}^\infty x^{2n+1}\frac{\left(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}-v^2\right)^n}{(2n+1)!}J_1(y)$$

The first two moments are reasonably easy to evaluate, and in fact the first order one is elementary:

$$J_0(y)=vK_1(yv)~~,~~J_1(y)=\frac{1+vy}{y^2}e^{-vy}:= \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}} \frac{v^2}{\sqrt{vy}}K_{3/2}(vy)$$

We note here that it is possible to express $(d^2/dt^2-1)^n K_1(t)$ as a linear combination of $K_1(t), K_1'(t)$ due to the 2nd order ODE that Bessel-K functions satisfy:

$$\left(d^2/dt^2-1\right)^n K_1(t)=P_n(t)K_1(t)+Q_n(t)K_1'(t)$$

This could be useful since these functions can be reduced to polynomials, and the resulting infinite series are just polynomial generating functions. However, quite nontrivially and compactly, we can rewrite this in terms of higher order Bessel-K functions:

$$\boxed{\left(\frac{d^2}{dt^2}-1\right)^nK_1(t)=(2n-1)!!\frac{K_{n+1}(t)}{t^n}},$$ with $n!!$ denoting the double factorial, 3!! = 3, 5!! = 15, etc...

Similarly, we can rewrite the derivatives of $K_{3/2}(t)/\sqrt{t}$ as

$$\boxed{\left(\frac{d^2}{dt^2}-1\right)^n\frac{K_{3/2}(t)}{\sqrt{t}}=2^n n!\frac{K_{n+3/2}(t)}{t^{n+1/2}}}$$

Putting everything together:

$$\boxed{I(x,y)=v\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(x^2v/y)^n}{(2n)!} (2n-1)!! K_{n+1}(vy)- \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}v\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(x^2v/y)^{n+1/2}}{(2n+1)!}2^n n!K_{n+3/2}(vy)}$$

To my knowledge, there is no available analytic formula for exponential generating functions of modified Bessel functions of the second kind, but the above connection is already pretty nice. Note that it's a bit more neat than expanding the exponential and sine functions separately and leads to just a single infinite sum of Bessel's (which also happen to be low level hypergeometrics).

Note: the two series have only been formally separated, they don't converge individually (by virtue of their individual integral representations not converging). To get a convergent answer, both series need to be taken into account.

The series has successfully been checked and found to to provide correct results when compared with the numerical integration of $I(x,y)$ for arbitrary $x$, $y$, and $v$.

DinosaurEgg
  • 10,775
  • As for the 2nd integral, I think the 2nd derivative that needs to be taken to evaluate the integral of $k^2 e^{-\sqrt{k^2+\alpha^2}} \sin (kt)$. Thanks for your great answer! – keynes Apr 01 '23 at 10:43
  • Also the third integral $x=it$ i guess... – keynes Apr 01 '23 at 10:50
  • Just submitted a correction to those typos. There was also $(2/\pi)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ missing in the expression of $K_{\frac{3}{2}}$ and a double factorial in the $n$the derivative of $K_1$. – keynes Apr 01 '23 at 12:06
  • It is worth noting that this approach works perfectly for the 2nd and 3rd integrals but not for the 1st one since $I$ is singular at $y=0$ at which the 1st integral is evaluated. – keynes Apr 01 '23 at 14:23
  • 1
    Thank you for taking the time to correct the omissions. Yes the series expansion only works for those- I don't know if there's any good way to evaluate the $y=0$ moments efficiently (the integrals clearly converge of course) – DinosaurEgg Apr 03 '23 at 03:27
  • 1
    The third integral should differ from it's given series at most by contact terms at $x=it=0$ by the way, so I wouldn't be too worried about the integral evaluations as long as one stays away from the origin. You also noted it works computationally which acts as corroborating evidence. – DinosaurEgg Apr 03 '23 at 04:32