1

The "Maz identity" states: $$ \int_0^\infty f(x)g(x)\mathrm{d}x = \int_0^\infty \mathcal{L}\{f\}(u)\mathcal{L}^{-1}\{g\}(u)\mathrm{d}u, $$ where $\mathcal{L}$ is the Laplace transform.

I came across this identity when trying to find the Mellin transform of $\sin(x)$. The theorem turns out to be very useful, but I could not find any reference for a proof of this identity. The only references on MSE are this and this, but neither provides a derivation. This identity also appears in a recent IG post by owenmmth, for those who are interested.

PS: Although not important to the question, but the Mellin transform is defined as $$ \{\mathcal{Mf}\}(s) = \int_0^\infty x^{s-1}f(x)\mathrm{d}x .$$

Jono94
  • 271
  • 2
    There is a simple proof on wikipedia, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace_transform#Properties_and_theorems – Zima Jun 11 '23 at 10:29
  • 3
    There was a guy on some Facebook math groups who's initials were AZ and somehow self-attributed and popularized these 2 identities. Their profession also happens to be a Mathematical Engineer - hence the "M" in MAZ.

    I guess. there are a lot of copy-writers on Instagram and other socials which spread this name, but as it didn't become really popular it often causes confusions - so it'll be better to use the name found on Wikipedia.

    – Zacky Jun 11 '23 at 11:26
  • @Zacky would it be wise for me to adopt this name if I ever come to use it in a formal paper? After hearing your explanation, I don't feel that the name is very authorative. – Jono94 Jun 11 '23 at 11:34
  • 4
    In short, no. It's best to avoid any possible confusions in articles, and this name isn't reliable + probably there are very few who are aware of it. I would simply call it a property of the Laplace transform and write the definition explicitly (and as for references I'd give a web.archive link to Wikipedia since I'm not aware of an authoritative one), but others may advise you better as I have no experience in writing math papers. – Zacky Jun 11 '23 at 11:48

2 Answers2

1

As Zima pointed out in the comment, Wikipedia's page on the Laplace transform gives a nice proof, so I thought I would answer my own question for others who happen to search for this.

Start by showing that

$$ \int_0^\infty h(x) \{\mathcal{L}g\}(x)\mathrm{d}x = \int_0^\infty \{\mathcal{L}h\}(x)g(x)\mathrm{d}x. $$

This is obvious from the definition of the Laplace transform and an application of Fubini's theorem:

$$ \begin{align} \int_0^\infty h(x) \{\mathcal{L}g\}(x)\mathrm{d}x &= \int_0^\infty h(x) \int_0^\infty g(u)e^{-ux}\mathrm{d}u \mathrm{d}x \\ &= \int_0^\infty g(u) \int_0^\infty h(x)e^{-ux}\mathrm{d}x \mathrm{d}u \\ &= \int_0^\infty \{\mathcal{L}h\}(u)g(u)\mathrm{d}u \\ &= \int_0^\infty \{\mathcal{L}h\}(x)g(x)\mathrm{d}x . \end{align} $$

Now make the substitution $h(x) = \{\mathcal{L}^{-1}f\}(x)$, so that $\{\mathcal{L}h\}(x) = f(x)$:

$$ \int_0^\infty \{\mathcal{L}^{-1}f\}(x) \{\mathcal{L}g\}(x)\mathrm{d}x = \int_0^\infty f(x)g(x)\mathrm{d}x. $$

This proves the useful Laplace transform identity.

Jono94
  • 271
0

May this paper answer your question?

NB: there are typos in the last Corollary.

MathArt
  • 1,053