This is what I believe the situation to be. AbsoluteOptions uses FullAxes under the hood. It turns out that FullAxes is still expecting Frame/FrameLabel options to be specified using the old Frame -> {b, l, t, r} syntax instead of the new Frame->{{l, r}, {b, t}} syntax. This is why FullAxes issues messages and doesn't work. This means the solution is simply to fix these options before running AbsoluteOptions/FullAxes on the graphic.
(update to fix PlotRange as well)
It turns out that the function PlotRange also has an issue with some "malformed" plot ranges, so I updated the code to handle that as well.
Here is the revised code:
Begin["FullAxesDump`"];
With[{graphic = ListLogPlot[{10, 100}]},
If[Quiet @ TrueQ @ Check[FullAxes @ graphic, True],
Unprotect[FullAxes];
FullAxes[arg_] /; !TrueQ@$FACheck := Block[{$FACheck=True},
FullAxes[fixOptions@arg]
];
Protect[FullAxes];
]
]
With[{graphic = Graphics[{}, GridLines->None, PlotRange->{{0, 1}, {All, All}}]},
If[Quiet @ TrueQ @ Check[PlotRange[graphic], True],
Unprotect[PlotRange];
PlotRange[arg_] /; !TrueQ@$FACheck := Block[{$FACheck=True},
PlotRange[fixOptions[arg]]
];
Protect[PlotRange];
]
]
fixOptions[x_]:=x
fixOptions[(tag:Graphics3D|Graphics)[g_,opts__]] := tag[
g,
Sequence@@ReplaceAll[
{opts},
Rule[h:Frame|FrameTicks|PlotRange,rhs_] :> h->fixRule[h,rhs]
],
Frame->False, Axes->False
]
fixRule[Frame|FrameTicks, {{l_,r_},{b_,t_}}] := {b,l,t,r}
fixRule[Frame|FrameTicks, {d_,s_}] := {d,Automatic,s,Automatic}
fixRule[PlotRange, a_List] := Replace[a, {All, All}->All, {1}]
fixRule[_,rhs_]:=rhs
End[];
Some comments:
I initally used System`Private`NewContextPath and System`Private`RestoreContextPathbecause I had trouble with contexts of my variable names, but that must have been a transient thing related to earlier code.
I only redefine FullAxes if using FullAxes on a ListPlot issues messages. This means that if you want to change the code after running it, you will need to first clear the new FullAxes downvalue that is created by the code. Something along the lines of Unprotect[FullAxes]; Clear[FullAxes]; Protect[FullAxes];
I use the foo /; ! TrueQ@flag := Block[{flag = True}, foo] trick so that the options get tweaked, and then the existing kernel code for foo gets run.
It turns out that Frame -> False needs to get explicitly added to the options so that FullAxes realizes that there really isn't a Frame, and it must process the Ticks/Axes code. Without Frame -> False, the FullAxes code turns Axes -> True into Axes -> {False, False}. Note that options handling uses the first instance of an option, so adding the default (Frame -> False) at the end should not affect output.
I think that's enough explanation. Here is what happens after loading the above code:
AbsoluteOptions[LogPlot[x^x, {x, 1, 5}, Frame -> True], FrameTicks];
AbsoluteOptions[ReliefPlot[RandomReal[1, {10, 10}]]];
AbsoluteOptions[ParametricPlot[r t, {r, 0, 5}, {t, 1, 2}]];
No error messages, although I don't claim that this fixes all cases where AbsoluteOptions issues messages. A similar treatment is possible for FullGraphics
Plothas not really been fixed. As addingPlotTheme->"Scientific"quickly shows. So maybe these problems should be treated as one single problem? – gwr Dec 12 '14 at 17:39Axes::axesbug appears to have been fixed, along with the one affecting theTicksoption. However a bug withFrameTicksremains which I am illustrating here. – Mr.Wizard Dec 12 '14 at 17:48PlotStyle -> "Web"does not put up a frame yet still (!) showsAxes::axesandTicks::ticksbug at the same time. So what has been "fixed" ? – gwr Dec 12 '14 at 17:53Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 4}, PlotStyle -> "Web"] // AbsoluteOptions-- what OS are you running? – Mr.Wizard Dec 12 '14 at 17:55Axes::axes: "{{True,False},{True,False}} is not a valid axis specification. "– gwr Dec 12 '14 at 18:02AbsoluteOptionsis such a useful tool it is a shame that it has been error/bug ridden for so many versions. – Mike Honeychurch Dec 12 '14 at 22:28Ticks::ticks : <valid explicit tick specification> is not a valid tick specification.It is correct in 5.2. You are probably right in thinking thatAbsoluteOptionshas been abandoned. – Oleksandr R. May 17 '15 at 15:09FullGraphicsandAbsoluteOptionshave never been (properly) updated for version 6+ graphics. – Mr.Wizard May 17 '15 at 15:11AbsoluteOptionshas always just given an approximation. So I see the difficulties. But I am also disappointed that there seems to be no effort to deal with them. – Szabolcs Aug 09 '16 at 11:35ReImandPerfectNumber. – QuantumDot Aug 09 '16 at 12:04