Questions tagged [feynman-diagrams]

A diagrammatic technique introduced by Richard Feynman to describe the quantum behaviour of subatomic particles and their interactions. Do not use for general questions on diagrams that are not of the Feynman kind.

Feynman diagrams were introduced by physicist Richard Feynman in 1948 to represent pictorially the mathematical expressions describing the quantum behaviour of subatomic particles. For example, the following graph represents a Feynman diagram:

feynman diagram

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Feynmann_Diagram_Gluon_Radiation.svg

Here, an electron and a positron annihilate, producing a photon (represented by the blue sine wave) that becomes a quark-antiquark pair, after which the antiquark radiates a gluon (represented by the green helix).

Introduction.

Feynman diagrams were introduced as a diagrammatic technique to keep track of the different terms that appear in the perturbative expansion of certain transition amplitudes in quantum mechanics. A primitive version of the technique was already being used by Stückelberg in his analysis of covariant perturbation theory, but the systematisation and popularisation of the method was a task undertaken by Feynman.

The problem was the following: given a Hamiltonian $H$ that describes a certain system, one wishes to compute its spectrum. To this end, it can be proven that it suffices to calculate the so-called propagation amplitude: $$ \langle q;t|q';t'\rangle=\langle q|\mathrm e^{iH(t-t')}|q'\rangle $$ where $q,q'$ are position eigenstates. In general, the Hamiltonian $H$ cannot be explicitly diagonalised (being a very complicated problem), so one contents oneself with approximating its spectrum in . The procedure is typically the following: we assume that we can write $H=H_0+V$, where $H_0$ is a Hamiltonian whose spectrum is known, and where $V$ is small (say, in the sense that it is multiplied by a small coupling constant). In this situation, the perturbative expansion of $\langle q;t|q';t'\rangle$ can be written schematically as $$ \langle q;t|q';t'\rangle\sim K_0+K_0VK_0+K_0VK_0VK_0+\cdots $$ where $K_0(q,t;q',t')\equiv \langle q|\mathrm e^{iH_0(t-t')}|q'\rangle$ is the of $H_0$, and each term represents a symbolic expression that contains iterated integrals of $K_0$ and $\langle q|V|q'\rangle$. In practice, the computation of the different terms in this series expansion can become very cumbersome very fast.

In his work, and inspired by some remarks made by Dirac, Feynman introduced a new formalism that we now call the formalism (or functional-integral for more generality). Using this new tool, Feynman was able to write down an algorithm to compute the transition amplitude $\langle q;t|q';t'\rangle$ as a power series expansion in the coupling constant. The algorithm had the advantage, over old-school methods, that it was explicitly covariant and much more efficient (in that it avoided redundant terms that only differ in the name of the dummy variables). The path-integral offered an alternative expression for the transition amplitude: $$ \langle q,t|q',t'\rangle\equiv\int \mathrm e^{-i\int (H(\tau)-p(\tau)\dot q(\tau))\mathrm d\tau}\ \mathrm dq\;\mathrm dp $$ which, when expanded in a power series in $V$, leads to the exact same terms as the old-school approach.

The path-integral was a completely new mathematical object, which was regarded with some skepticism and unfamiliarity by Feynman's peers. Dyson was able to prove that the technique was nevertheless completely equivalent to the old-school methods, which help convince the community of the convenience of the new approach. For this reason, the diagrammatic technique is sometimes referred to as the Feynman-Dyson expansion.

In any case, either directly from the path-integral, or following the old-school method, the perturbative expansion of the transition amplitude can be written as a power series in the coupling constants, where each term consists of a combination of propagators and powers of $V$. Feynman organised the expansion in graphical terms as follows: each propagator is associated to a line, and each factor of $V$ to a vertex. To compute the transition amplitude to a given order, one draws all graphs with that many vertices, and connects them using lines. From the graph one can read, by means of a certain set of rules, what is the value of the term in the perturbative expansion. A collection of different Feynman diagrams can be found in the Wikimedia page on Feynman diagrams.

Field theory.

An advantage of the path-integral approach is that its generalisation from standard to is rather straightforward. What's more, as the path-integral is naturally written in terms of the action of the system rather than its Hamiltonian, the framework deals easily with Lorentz invariance, making it the most convenient tool to study relativistic quantum mechanics and . Nevertheless, the framework is also convenient in the study of non-relativistic field systems, as in .

1625 questions
4
votes
1 answer

Photon-photon scattering matrix element

I have to write the matrix element $i\mathcal{M}$ given the Feynman rules of QED for the $\gamma \gamma$ scattering as the example above. Suppose that time is the vertical. There are two times, $t, t'$ such that $t'>t$ with two nodes. I now more or…
J L
  • 2,877
4
votes
1 answer

Feynman Diagram for Bragg Equation

Did Feynman ever derive the Bragg equation as a particle representation using Feynman diagrams? And where is it available? I spoke to Freeman Dyson and he couldn't recall.
4
votes
1 answer

About the Feynman parameterization--when the 'Delta' in the denominator is minus, how should I do?

I have thought about this question for a very long time. The question will be described as the following. I have an effective Feynman loop diagram to calculate, which describing B meson decay into 3 particles. There are 4 propagators. After using…
zzx2012
  • 41
4
votes
1 answer

Feynman diagram for annihilation

What is the difference between these two Feynman diagrams? They should both describe the same physical process, annihilation between an electron and a positron.
SuperCiocia
  • 24,596
1
vote
0 answers

Two forms of Feynman Diagrams?

I am confused. I know Feynman Diagrams looks like the ones here. But then I saw these, look in page 17[1247] of this paper. Any idea?
student1
  • 594
1
vote
1 answer

Compton Scattering Lowest Order Feyman Diagram

I have some trouble understanding the lowest order feyman diagrams for compton scattering. Does two feyman diagrams mean that compton scattering can happen through two processes? What is the specific process in each case?
TaeNyFan
  • 4,215
1
vote
0 answers

Gauge and mass eigenstates

We learn in the Standard Model that the gauge fields can be either in mass or gauge eigenstates. I wonder in the calculations with Feynmann diagram, which states should I use.
user43442
  • 127
1
vote
0 answers

Is a graph 1 particle irreducible if the split would change the number of external legs?

Is a graph 1 particle irreducible if the split would change the number of external legs? For example; http://www.stevepur.com/physics/matter/matter40.gif (sorry, image upload is giving errors) The graph could be split by cutting one propagator, but…
1
vote
2 answers

Ambiguity regarding Feynman Diagrams

I recently started learning feynman diagrams but I am a bit confused by how they are constructed from scratch (we are expected to memorize them without knowing exactly how they work). In particular, how do you know which gauge boson a particular…
user45220
  • 1,241
  • 7
  • 29
  • 44
1
vote
1 answer

Representing momentum exchange in Feynman diagrams

I'm a bit confused about how momentum exchange is represented in Feynman diagrams. I'm going through Tongs qft notes on interactions right now and he demonstrates how to draw Feynman diagrams with a few examples using the scalar Yukawa interaction.…
Dargscisyhp
  • 5,289
1
vote
1 answer

Evaluating Feynman diagram for coupling between scalar field and dirac particle and anti particle

If I have a scalar field $\alpha$ and a Dirac particle $\beta$ and its anti particle $\overline{\beta}$, such that the three couple to give a vertex factor of $-ik$ when evaluating the Feynman diagram (where $k$ is a dimensionless coupling…
0
votes
0 answers

Calculating Feynman diagram of W-Boson exchange

Hello, for my bachelor thesis I have to calculate $|M|^2$ of this Feynman diagram. However, I have no understanding of QFT so far. I was told to just look up the Feynman rules and put them to use. As expected, using the Feynman rules without…
minits
  • 71
  • 6
0
votes
0 answers

Scattering of electron anti-neutrino on hydrogen (Feyman diagram)

Does anyone have a reference how the (lowest-order) Feynman diagrams for the scattering of an electron anti-neutrino $\overline\nu_e$ on a hydrogen atom would look like? I'm a bit confused about the fact that the proton consists of multiple quarks.
Sha Vuklia
  • 962
  • 1
  • 10
  • 28
0
votes
0 answers

Why is u-channel diagram kinked in such way?

Let us consider Bhabha scattering as an example. Using Mandelstam variables, we can think about u-channel Feynman diagrams (see below). Notice the kink at the first two vertices where virtual particle photon is being exchanged. I suspect that the…
Nugi
  • 541