10

I have a weibull plot (at least I try to create a decent one), based on the code shown here.

However I do want to have a minor grid as it typically appears in log plots. Here however the y axis tics are completely self defined.

So I want to have the major y ticks and major y grid lines at

yticklabels={0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,1,2,3,4,5,10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,99,99.9},

and the minor y grid to be shown inbetween at

{0.1,0.11,0.12,0.13,0.14,0.15,0.16,0.17,0.18,0.19,0.2,0.21,0.22,0.23,0.24,0.25,0.26,0.27,0.28,0.29,0.3,0.325,0.35,0.375,0.4,0.425,0.45,0.475,0.5,0.55,0.6,0.65,0.7,0.75,0.8,0.85,0.9,0.95,1,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2,2.25,2.5,2.75,3,3.5,4,4.5,5,5.5,6,6.5,7,7.5,8,8.5,9,9.5,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60,62,64,66,68,70,72,74,76,78,80,82,84,86,88,90,90.9,91.8,92.7,93.6,94.5,95.4,96.3,97.2,98.1,99,99.1,99.2,99.3,99.4,99.5,99.6,99.7,99.8,99.9}

The basic plot is created with

\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{axis}[scale only axis,
    xmode=log,log ticks with fixed point,
    only marks,
    xmin=0,xmax = 20.0,
    ymin=0.001, ymax=0.999,
    grid=major,
    ytick  ={0.001,0.002,0.003,0.004,0.005,
             0.01,0.02,0.03,0.04,0.05,
             0.10,0.20,0.30,0.40,0.50,0.60,0.70,0.80,0.90,0.99,0.999},
    yticklabels={0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,1,2,3,4,5,10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,99,99.9},
    y coord trafo/.code=\pgfmathparse{ln(-ln(1-#1)))},
    y coord inv trafo/.code=\pgfmathparse{exp(-exp(-#1-1))}
    ]
%
\addplot[domain=0.01:100, sharp plot] gnuplot{ 1-exp(-x**2)};
\end{axis} 
\end{tikzpicture}

The following picture shows the resulting plot enter image description here

The question is how to create/define minor grid tics ?

EDIT: Here is a part of an image I want to recreate with this plot:

enter image description here

EDIT: I implemented all suggestions but now realized that I can not set the style (color of the lines) of the extra y tick positions independent on the major grid style. The extra ticks however shall define the minor grid positions and thus be printed in the style of the minor grids.

Also, the grid positions at the low values are calculated false. There spacing does not match the inserted values. Here is the code and the resulting picture:

\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{axis}[scale only axis,
  % plot style
  every axis plot/.append style={line width=1.0pt,blue},
  % labels
  xlabel=Lebensdauer $t$,
  ylabel=Ausfallhäufigkeitssumme $R(t)$,
  % axis limits
  xmin=0,xmax = 20.0,
  ymin=0.001, ymax=0.999,
  % calculate functions only in this domain
  domain=0.1:20,
  % x-axis: log scale with linear numbers
  xmode=log,log ticks with fixed point,
  % grid style
  grid=both, % major and minor for both axis (alt: major, minor, none)
  minor grid style={gray!25},
  major grid style={black!50},
  % -- set weibull plot grid positions --
  % remove tick lines
  major tick length=0pt,
  minor tick length=0pt,
  % yticks (major grid lines)
  ytick      ={0.001,0.002,0.003,0.004,0.005,
               0.01,0.02,0.03,0.04,0.05,
               0.10,0.20,0.30,0.40,0.50,0.60,0.70,0.80,0.90,0.99,0.999},
  % according labels
  yticklabels={0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,1,2,3,4,5,10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,99,99.9},
  % 
  extra y tick style={yticklabels={},color=red}, % color is ignored !
  % position of minor y-grid lines
  extra y ticks=  {0.001,0.0011,0.0012,0.0013,0.0014,0.0015,0.0016,0.0017,0.0018,0.0019,0.002,0.0021,0.0022,0.0023,0.0024,0.0025,0.0026,0.0027,0.0028,0.0029,0.003,0.00325,0.0035,0.00375,0.004,0.00425,0.0045,0.00475,0.005,0.0055,0.006,0.0065,0.007,0.0075,0.008,0.0085,0.009,0.0095,0.01,0.011,0.012,0.013,0.014,0.015,0.016,0.017,0.018,0.019,0.02,0.0225,0.025,0.0275,0.03,0.035,0.04,0.045,0.05,0.055,0.06,0.065,0.07,0.075,0.08,0.085,0.09,0.095,0.1,0.11,0.12,0.13,0.14,0.15,0.16,0.17,0.18,0.19,0.2,0.21,0.22,0.23,0.24,0.25,0.26,0.27,0.28,0.29,0.3,0.32,0.34,0.36,0.38,0.4,0.42,0.44,0.46,0.48,0.5,0.52,0.54,0.56,0.58,0.6,0.62,0.64,0.66,0.68,0.7,0.72,0.74,0.76,0.78,0.8,0.82,0.84,0.86,0.88,0.9,0.909,0.918,0.927,0.936,0.945,0.954,0.963,0.972,0.981,0.99,0.991,0.992,0.993,0.994,0.995,0.996,0.997,0.998,0.999},
  % tic position calculation (coord. transformation)
  % must be below the tick positions !
  y coord trafo/.code=\pgfmathparse{ln(-ln(1-#1)))},
  y coord inv trafo/.code=\pgfmathparse{exp(-exp(-#1-1))}
]
%
\addplot[domain=0.01:100, sharp plot] gnuplot{ 1-exp(-x**2)};
\end{axis} 
\end{tikzpicture}

enter image description here

  • 1
    I would use extra y ticks=<list of tick positions>, extra y tick style={yticklabels={}, black!25} or something along those lines (can't check the code right, now, sorry), to "fake" minor ticks. – Jake Nov 06 '12 at 21:38
  • I do not want the extra tic positions. I want lines at those points for a minor grid. I attached a part of an image I want to rebuild. – Matthias Pospiech Nov 06 '12 at 22:24
  • If you do grid=both you should be getting via Jake's suggestions. – percusse Nov 06 '12 at 22:31
  • I implemented all suggestions and added further problems, since the question is not fully solved so far. – Matthias Pospiech Nov 10 '12 at 18:36
  • 1
    My apologies but I really don't get your question. There are many things happening at once and I'm not sure what your problem is. I've made a sample code here : http://pastebin.com/LkVuEAk0 Can you edit your your question more specifically such that we understand clearly if it is a style issue or a tick issue or you are missing some gridlines. The reason is that I have no idea what a correct Weibull plot look like and it seems that you assume that we (well, let me speak for myself only) do. – percusse Nov 11 '12 at 12:43
  • minor grid values can not be set by pgfplots, its simply not supported. 2. the extra y ticks idea has the problem that these belong to the major grid. So I would like to know a workaround to set the style in the color of the minor grids. 3. the ticks positions set by the coord transformation are calculated wrong by pgfplots/TeX for the values up to 0.5 - the spacing would rather look like it does from 90-99.9.
  • – Matthias Pospiech Nov 11 '12 at 21:29