I'm typesetting a manuscript that is required to turn all \emph into underlines. But then I want to use the original definition of \emph for the list of references. How do I get \emph to behave like normal again?
Asked
Active
Viewed 2.2k times
55
lockstep
- 250,273
Stefan Müller
- 6,901
- 3
- 29
- 61
2 Answers
52
Another solution found in the manual is to use the \usepackage option [normalem], i.e., \usepackage[normalem]{ulem}. This is probably a better solution if you are using the package ulem just for line struck through word or some other feature, but want to use \emph as italics. I know this is not exactly your case, but may be useful for someone else.
-
There is a huge benefit from using this approach. Without [normalem], each \emph appears as underlined non-italic text. This one preserves emph. +1 – lmsasu Feb 22 '23 at 05:50
44
Declare \normalem at the appropriate point in the document body. (The correspondent macro to switch to "underlined" emphasis is \ULforem.)
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{ulem}
\begin{document}
Some \emph{emphasised} text.
\normalem
Some \emph{emphasised} text.
\ULforem
Some \emph{emphasised} text.
\end{document}

lockstep
- 250,273