Using ulem package changes the style of my reference

Question

I used this \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} in order to put underline in my file and the next thing I notice is that my reference are all messed up. Here is how I used my reference:

\include{Appendix}
\appendix
\renewcommand{\appendixname}{Appendix A}
\renewcommand{\thesection}{A.\arabic{section}}

I found that all the font and the styles of the reference are no longer the same as before. Then I tried to put a \mbox in front of my \cite{}; it still does not solve the problem. Does anyone experience something similar?

Welcome to tex.sx, you can mark code blocks with the {} button (or just indent by 4 spaces) and inline code using back ticks, see my edit. It always helps if you post a complete small document that shows the problem rather than fragments. — David Carlisle, Jun 02 '13 at 23:08
Your question asks about ulem and \cite but the code section you show uses neither so it is not at all clear how it relates to the question. Defining \appendixname as Appendix A is wrong (the number or letter should be handled by the counter) but it is unlikely to be the cause of the problem described. — David Carlisle, Jun 02 '13 at 23:12
Since you haven't responded to comments I've suggested to close this question. — Alan Munn, Jul 04 '13 at 00:19
See also, text decorations - Getting \emph back to normal after loading ulem - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange — user202729, Sep 16 '22 at 17:35

score 24 · Answer 1 · answered Jun 03 '13 at 22:24

24

Package ulem redefines \em/\emph. Emphasized text is no longer in italics, but the text is underlined. This can be turned off by option normalem:

\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}

answered Jun 03 '13 at 22:24

Heiko Oberdiek

271,626

1

You made my day - fantastic. – Jan Nov 01 '20 at 13:54

Using ulem package changes the style of my reference

1 Answers1

Linked