Can someone tell me what commando is needed to make expressions like in the text below. I mean like it is symmetric around the arrow.

Can someone tell me what commando is needed to make expressions like in the text below. I mean like it is symmetric around the arrow.

Apart from the wrong dots, it seems an align*:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\begin{document}
\lipsum*[2]
\begin{align*}
\{B_1,\dots,B\cup\{\lnot\lnot\phi\},\dots,B_i\}\quad
& \rightsquigarrow \quad
\{B_1,\dots,B\cup\{\phi\},\dots,B_i\}
\\
\{B_1,\dots,B\cup\{\phi\land\psi\},\dots,B_i\}\quad
& \rightsquigarrow \quad
\{B_1,\dots,B\cup\{\phi,\psi\},\dots,B_i\}
\\
\{B_1,\dots,B\cup\{\lnot(\phi\land\psi)\},\dots,B_i\}\quad
& \rightsquigarrow \quad
\{B_1,\dots,B\cup\{\lnot\phi\},B\cup\{\lnot\psi\},\dots,B_i\}
\end{align*}
\lipsum[3]
\end{document}
Note that lipsum is just to produce dummy text and is not needed in your document.

You can use a regular array:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}% Just for this example
\usepackage[nopar]{lipsum}% Just for this example
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\begin{document}
\lipsum[1]
\[
\begin{array}{r@{\quad\rightsquigarrow\quad}l}
\{ B_1, \dots, B \cup \{ \neg\neg\phi \}, \dots, B_i \} &
\{ B_1, \dots, B \cup \{ \phi \}, \dots, B_i \} \\
\{B_1, \dots, B \cup \{ \phi \wedge \psi \}, \dots, B_i\} &
\{B_1, \dots, B \cup \{ \phi, \psi \}, \dots, B_i\} \\
\{B_1, \dots, B \cup \{ \neg(\phi \wedge \psi) \}, \dots, B_i\} &
\{B_1, \dots, B \cup \{ \neg\phi \}, B \cup \{ \neg\psi \}, \dots, B_i\}
\end{array}
\]
\lipsum[2]
\end{document}
The column specification has a forced column separation causing the centred \rightsquigarrow.
Other options also exist with align-like environments from amsmath, if needed.
array spacing (vertical) can be adjusted by following some of the techniques listed in Column and row padding in tables. For example, adding \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3} inside the display math equation spacing the content out vertically quite nicely.
– Werner
Apr 13 '15 at 22:53