0

how can ı write this symbol. If you help me this problem thank you very much. enter image description here

Zang Li
  • 61
  • 4
    In the future answers to “How to look up a symbol?” may help if you are looking for a particular symbol – Willoughby Sep 03 '21 at 22:47
  • I’m more interested in how you managed to input a small caps “I” in the title of this question? – Gaussler Sep 05 '21 at 12:04
  • 1
    @Gaussler The character is "U+0131 ı LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS I". At a guess, probably a "tapo"/typo/auto-complete action when using a keyboard overlay or input method that presents a list of glyphs to choose from: I i Ì ì Í í Î î Ï ï Ĩ ĩ Ī ī Ĭ ĭ Į į İ ı etc. Easy to do. I i Ì ì Í í Î î Ï ï Ĩ ĩ Ī ī Ĭ ĭ Į į İ ı – Cicada Sep 06 '21 at 06:34
  • @Cicada Yes, sure, I can also look up unicode characters if I have to. But this is not something I just end up accidentally typing instead of an “I”. – Gaussler Sep 06 '21 at 08:04
  • @Gaussler . No lookup. I did it just then - long-press i on the alpha keyboard, then slide to what looked like I but was in fact dotless-i: so a "slide-o", not a "tap-o" or typo. These phone screens are too small. :) New txtng spelling. Handy, though. – Cicada Sep 06 '21 at 11:51

1 Answers1

6

Here there is the example of your image using a macro named \hupdown: the symbol is \gtrless.

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
\newcommand\hupdown[1]{\mathop{\operatorname{#1}}}

\begin{document} [\hupdown{\scriptstyle \gtrless}_{\mathcal{H}_0}^{\mathcal{H}_1}] \end{document}

enter image description here

Or if you prefer you can choose this MWE reducing the size of the symbol with \scriptscriptstyle:

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
\newcommand\hupdown[1]{\mathop{\operatorname{#1}}}

\begin{document} [\hupdown{ \gtrless}_{\scriptscriptstyle\mathcal{H}_0}^{\scriptscriptstyle\mathcal{H}_1}] \end{document}

enter image description here

Addendum after a deleted answer that it is an edit on the question of the user.

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
\usepackage[bb = boondox]{mathalfa}
\newcommand\hupdown[1]{\mathop{\operatorname{#1}}} 
\DeclareSymbolFont{largesymbolsCM}{OMX}{cmex}{m}{n}
\let\txsum\sum
\let\sum\relax
\DeclareMathSymbol{\sum}{\mathop}{largesymbolsCM}{"50}
\DeclareMathAlphabet{\pazocal}{OMS}{zplm}{m}{n}

\begin{document} [\mathbb{T}{i}(\boldsymbol{y}{i})=\sum_{n=1}^{N}{|\boldsymbol{y}{i}}[n]{{|}^{2}}\hupdown{ \gtrless}{\scriptscriptstyle\pazocal{H}_0}^{\scriptscriptstyle\pazocal{H}_1}\lambda] \end{document}

enter image description here

Addendum of the 2021/09/08. Another alternative given from @egreg in this question here Underset and Overset Together is to use the command \overunderset{....}{....}{....} without a macro:

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath} % for \overunderset command
\usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
\usepackage[bb = boondox]{mathalfa}
\DeclareSymbolFont{largesymbolsCM}{OMX}{cmex}{m}{n}
\let\txsum\sum
\let\sum\relax
\DeclareMathSymbol{\sum}{\mathop}{largesymbolsCM}{"50}
\DeclareMathAlphabet{\pazocal}{OMS}{zplm}{m}{n}

\begin{document} [\mathbb{T}{i}(\boldsymbol{y}{i})=\sum_{n=1}^{N}{|\boldsymbol{y}_{i}}[n]{{|}^{2}}\overunderset{\pazocal{H}_0}{\pazocal{H}_1}{\gtrless}\lambda] \end{document}

enter image description here

Sebastiano
  • 54,118
  • 1
    You write about the second MWE "you can choose this MWE reducing the size of the symbol", but when I look at the posted images the hupdown symbol appears larger (at least, proportinally compared to the the H_1 and H_0) in the second image posted. Did you accidentally get the images swapped around? Or am I misunderstanding? – Jarak Sep 03 '21 at 23:32
  • @Jarak I have done a mistake. :-( – Sebastiano Sep 03 '21 at 23:34
  • @Jarak I was falling asleep. Can you please see if this is now correct? – Sebastiano Sep 03 '21 at 23:38
  • 1
    Hmmm, I just ran both of your MWEs (recent MikTeX installation, using pdflatex), and the second one definitely comes out with a larger symbol than the first one. Looking more closely at them, though, I realise that I was indeed misunderstanding: The second MWE actually adjust the H_1 and H_0, not the middle symbol. Anyway, you've answered the question well, probably best just to leave it until you feel more awake :) – Jarak Sep 03 '21 at 23:45