Here's my attempt at a soccer/foot ball, updated with an improved surface model:

First create the patches (code below):
pl /@ {5, 6}

Then stitch them together using FindGeometricTransform to help with the work.
The patches are made using NDSolve and simple PDE over a polygonal region. (Pretty cool, I thought.)
Then they have to be sized and "inflated" (i.e., the underlying element mesh is projected onto the sphere). There's some elementary geometry involved in that. The PDE surface represents the leather patch over the region, and the solution ends up being added to the height of the inflated element-mesh domain.
(* coverings of the patches of n = 5, 6 sides *)
Clear[sol];
sol[n_] := sol[n] = NDSolve[
{Laplacian[u[x, y], {x, y}] - 400 u[x, y] == -20, (* can adjust coefficients *)
DirichletCondition[u[x, y] == 0, True]},
u,
{x, y} ∈ Polygon@CirclePoints[n],
Method -> {"FiniteElement", "MeshOptions" -> {MaxCellMeasure -> 0.001}}
]
(* circumradius of a CirclePoints[n] facet *)
crad[n_] := 2 Sin[π/n] PolyhedronData["TruncatedIcosahedron", "Circumradius"];
(* plots of the patches of n = 5, 6 sides *)
plotcolor[5] = Black;
plotcolor[6] = White;
Clear[pl];
pl[n_] :=
pl[n] = ParametricPlot3D[
crad[n] Normalize@{x, y, N@Sqrt[crad[n]^2 - 1]} +
{0, 0, u[x, y] - Sqrt[crad[n]^2 - 1]} /. sol[n] // Evaluate,
{x, y} ∈ (u["ElementMesh"] /. First@sol[n]),
Mesh -> None,
PlotStyle -> Directive[Specularity[White, 100], plotcolor[n]],
PlotRange -> 1, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1}, Lighting -> "Neutral"];
Graphics3D[
MapThread[
GeometricTransformation,
{First /@ pl /@ {5, 6},
Flatten /@ Last@Reap[
Sow[
Last@FindGeometricTransform[#,
PadRight[CirclePoints[Length@#], {Automatic, 3}],
Method -> "Linear"], Length@#]; & /@
Cases[Normal@PolyhedronData["TruncatedIcosahedron"],
Polygon[p_] :> p, Infinity],
{5, 6}]}
]]
(* picture shown above *)
There were gaps due to a stupid error in crad[], which are now fixed..
Update (new: gaps removed)
With DirichletCondition[u[x, y] == 0.01 Sin[60 ArcTan[x, y]], True], you get stitches!

To remove the little gaps that result, I had to construct an element mesh whose points would line up when the patches are assembled and alter the expression plotted by pl[].
emesh[n_] :=
With[{pts = 4 * 60}, (* 60 corresponds to the BC in sol below.
4 is the oversampling; 8 gives slightly better quality *)
ToElementMesh@ToBoundaryMesh[
"Coordinates" -> With[{r = Cos[Pi/n] Sec[Mod[t + Pi/2, 2 Pi/n, -Pi/n]]},
Most@Table[r {Cos[t], Sin[t]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi, 2 Pi/pts}]],
"BoundaryElements" -> {LineElement[Partition[Range@pts, 2, 1, 1]]}
]
];
Clear[sol];
sol[n_] := sol[n] = NDSolve[
{Laplacian[u[x, y], {x, y}] - 400 u[x, y] == -20,
DirichletCondition[u[x, y] == 0.01 Sin[60 ArcTan[x, y]], True]},
u,
{x, y} ∈ emesh[n]
];
And if in pl[] we plot
crad[n] (1 + u[x, y]) Normalize@{x, y, N@Sqrt[crad[n]^2 - 1]} -
{0, 0, Sqrt[crad[n]^2 - 1]} /. First@sol[n]
then we get no gaps (although I get an extrapolation warning, it seems to be right next to the boundary). In a sense, this seems a better expression to plot anyway.
Norm /@ PolyhedronData["TruncatedIcosahedron", "VertexCoordinates"] // Firstcan just bePolyhedronData["TruncatedIcosahedron", "Circumradius"], andNorm /@ Differences@CirclePoints[n] // Firstis just2 Sin[π/n], socrad[n_] := PolyhedronData["TruncatedIcosahedron", "Circumradius"] Csc[π/n]/2– J. M.'s missing motivation Jun 18 '16 at 01:24"Properties", and when I try them, most of them don't work. It just feels easier to compute everything. – Michael E2 Jun 18 '16 at 01:5710^-6perturbation in your patches? – J. M.'s missing motivation Jun 18 '16 at 04:11crad[], now fixed. – Michael E2 Jun 18 '16 at 13:27